<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Professionals still haven&#8217;t questioned our epistemology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://increaseourtaxes.com/professionals-still-havent-questioned-our-epistemology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://increaseourtaxes.com/professionals-still-havent-questioned-our-epistemology/</link>
	<description>Towards a more Livable America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 04:25:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shaferfinancial</title>
		<link>http://increaseourtaxes.com/professionals-still-havent-questioned-our-epistemology/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>shaferfinancial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyst.wordpress.com/?p=89#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Zack, keep up the good work!  You are actively looking behind the curtains and that is a good thing.  If you want to talk about alternatives to mutual fund investing inside an 401K, you can contact me dave@shaferwealthacademy.com.  That is what I do for clients!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zack, keep up the good work!  You are actively looking behind the curtains and that is a good thing.  If you want to talk about alternatives to mutual fund investing inside an 401K, you can contact me <a href="mailto:dave@shaferwealthacademy.com">dave@shaferwealthacademy.com</a>.  That is what I do for clients!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary</title>
		<link>http://increaseourtaxes.com/professionals-still-havent-questioned-our-epistemology/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyst.wordpress.com/?p=89#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Shafer Financial,

First the easy point.  I do agree that gold is a risky investment, and it is not one I myself would pursue.  Most of that post is a quote, however, and I do not agree with the entire quote.

Thanks for the heads up on the Dalbar studies; I will read them this afternoon.  I&#039;ve pursued DCA through my 401(k) at work, and I&#039;m looking into alternative investments.

Thanks for reading my blog!
Zack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shafer Financial,</p>
<p>First the easy point.  I do agree that gold is a risky investment, and it is not one I myself would pursue.  Most of that post is a quote, however, and I do not agree with the entire quote.</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up on the Dalbar studies; I will read them this afternoon.  I&#8217;ve pursued DCA through my 401(k) at work, and I&#8217;m looking into alternative investments.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading my blog!<br />
Zack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaferfinancial</title>
		<link>http://increaseourtaxes.com/professionals-still-havent-questioned-our-epistemology/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>shaferfinancial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyst.wordpress.com/?p=89#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Zach,

Interesting post.  But, in my mind it is another version of &quot;this time it is different,&quot; but from a pessimists viewpoint.  The last time we heard that was from the optimist viewpoint in 1998-2000 and we know what happened then!

But the biggest issue I think is your assumption that DCA into mutual funds actually worked for folks during the 1950-2000 time period.  It didn&#039;t as it doesn&#039;t now [lookup the Dalbar studies of mutual fund investor returns].

Your call for putting folks money into gold, is in my opinion very risky, because there is little intrinsic value in gold.  Instead they should buy stock in a company that has real profits and real value IMHO.

Investing in the stock market is not a game for passive folks. But there are many products out there that have guarantees associated with them for the passive minded!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach,</p>
<p>Interesting post.  But, in my mind it is another version of &#8220;this time it is different,&#8221; but from a pessimists viewpoint.  The last time we heard that was from the optimist viewpoint in 1998-2000 and we know what happened then!</p>
<p>But the biggest issue I think is your assumption that DCA into mutual funds actually worked for folks during the 1950-2000 time period.  It didn&#8217;t as it doesn&#8217;t now [lookup the Dalbar studies of mutual fund investor returns].</p>
<p>Your call for putting folks money into gold, is in my opinion very risky, because there is little intrinsic value in gold.  Instead they should buy stock in a company that has real profits and real value IMHO.</p>
<p>Investing in the stock market is not a game for passive folks. But there are many products out there that have guarantees associated with them for the passive minded!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
